FANDOM


  • THERE NEEDS TO BE THERMAL SCOPES(or night scopes)

      Loading editor
    • yes

        Loading editor
    • no, never. this whould likely ruin the need to use other scopes and allow players to just see players without having to look, and the bright colours whould also likely increase reaction time. if the deveopers did introduce thermal scopes, they whould need to balance it heavily. perhaps adding a shorter hold breath time and reduced visabilty at long range. but even this may not balance it right.

        Loading editor
    • There must be more

        Loading editor
    • No. Absolutely not. Combining this with a ballistics tracker would be terrible. Just TERRIBLE. It would be a whole new level of N O O B.

      Thermal optics generally take away the skill from target acquisition and aim, as it just shows the enemies are an obvious red figure waddling across the map that is impossible to miss. It is too easy to use.

        Loading editor
    • Good idea, and to the point that it makes people obvious because they would be waddling neon blobs, that’s true but only to a degree. They would make it very easy to spot campers but in all honesty they would not provide too much assistance in killing already moving targets. Targets that are already moving are very easy to see, as the human eye is very attracted to motion, it is also very easy to nerf, by limiting the range of detection and make it have a “boot up” time and a limited time of continuous usage requiring a short cooldown after use.

        Loading editor
    • No

        Loading editor
    • No [2]

        Loading editor
    • That would be sick but of course the m60 users would abuse it

        Loading editor
    • I don't know why we need Thermal Scopes. This is not a game where finding people is difficult. Plus, how would it work?

        Loading editor
    • It is when they stay very still and wait for people to come by.

        Loading editor
    • For all the naysayers...

      1. They don’t have much magnification, if at all.

      2. They’re bulky af, so they’ll take up a lot of your screen.

      3. Aiming down a thermal scope more often than not has the same peripheral vision shortcomings as sniper scopes

      4. Good luck sniping with only a dot reticle.

      5. How it could work? Slap a white overlay on all parts of a Robloxian or Robloxians that are visible when aiming down the scope. The white overlay is blocked by all objects, even glass. The rest of the scenery is grayscaled when aiming down sights. If the PK-A has a blue overlay when zoomed in, a greyscaled overlay shouldn’t prove too difficult.

        Loading editor
    • I agre with @1Phorensis. I don't think that a thermal optic would really be useful. I already feel that target acquisition in PF is easy enough, given that the maps are completely static, so motion from players is easier to detect and more obvious. In a AAA game, (Take CoD for an example) target acquisition isn't the same because of a faster pace and animated parts of a map, for example. with faster pace and more motion, it can be harder to acquire a target due to all of the motion that the human eye is picking up. Thermal optics help with this, and in my opinion are just general cheese. Take a look at PF, and you have a slower pace with static maps with awkward waddling block figures running around the map. Easier acquisition. No need for thermal optics.

      Sorry if I am completely wrong on these statements.

        Loading editor
    • Until they bring in swaying trees, burning fires, and wildlife, I don't think there is a place or need for such optics.

        Loading editor
    • I played Blizard. I withdraw all my previous arguments against a thermal scope

        Loading editor
    • Maybe they will finally have the equipment tab not say "coming soon"

        Loading editor
    • but what if thermal scopes would only show players in certain range? maybe 15 to 25 studs?

        Loading editor
    • At 15 to 25 studs you already hear them.

        Loading editor
    • At 25 studs you wouldn’t need a thermal scope. That’s just absolutely worthless as the only way it would be useful is if they were hiding behind something. Studs aren’t actually that big. 25 studs like like ten-fifteen metres.

        Loading editor
    • Thermal Scopes are basically a weaker version of wallhacks, also combined with the Bal Track means that under the hands of noobs, they would literally snipe the entire server. 

        Loading editor
    • No, definetly not since you might as well have a .50 BMG rifle and so wallbanging in CQB

      Also, it literally lights up the camper, making it easier to spot rather than hide

        Loading editor
    • I still think think Thermal Optics would be useless given the fact that spotting exists.

        Loading editor
    • Despite Spotting exist, moderate-good players would often go into hiding and attack from a different route. While that Thermal Scopes could still see them without them discovering that they're detected. Also the idea is kinda useless because after StyLiS got rid of day/night cycles. 

        Loading editor
    • They aren’t gone.

        Loading editor
    • They didn't get rid of day/night cycles. I'm pretty sure, at least.

        Loading editor
    • For about 1 week - 3 weeks or even longer (and I join about 3 - 7 matches on weekends), I haven't seen any maps that are at night. I might be a bit wrong to assume that they remove day/night cycle, but I'm not sure, since all of the matches I've played are on daytime (and don't go dusk). 

        Loading editor
    • BACKSCATTER XRAYS FOR BFG, BABY!

        Loading editor
    • No

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.